Wednesday, August 4, 2010
To summarize: Bill Gates and Warren Buffet are rallying US billionaires to give half of their wealth (over time or at their deaths) to charity, and apparently many billionaires have already rallied up behind it.
That's 90 billion between Gates and Buffet alone (they're giving most of it I believe). I remember having these conversations with friends, where we would try to calculate the possibility of these guys actually spending their money in their lifetime, or in their families lifetimes. Turns out, it just isn't happening. Not even if they redid their kitchen as often as humanly possible. They could fund their own spacefaring program, but as Richard Garriot showed us, that isn't really necessary when you can just "hitch a ride with very deep pockets."
Now, I'm cautious as to how to interpret this. Recent figures of wealth distribution indicate what was true in 2006: the top 2% control most (>51%). Where the Giving Pledge to pull off even with a fifth US 400 billionaires, that would mean an immensely large amount of money going back to the "ordinary"" people, in strict terms of wealth redistribution.
Is this out of the goodness of their hearts? I would normally jump to say that there has to be an agenda... However, reading the letters from various individuals (http://givingpledge.org/) especially Warren Buffet's, I'm getting the feeling that it's just that, philanthropy. On hindsight, I shouldn't be surprised, either. I mean, take the Christmas Carol and Scrooge. People change, constantly, especially when age brings them a more mature look of the future: and right now, the future looks rather grim. And I don't mean that as a political statement: taking a look at world population, the environment, hunger, disease, that's enough to give anyone a downer. From the comments on the article, I think mostly everyone is rallying behind this effort. Then, a very simple analyis of a very simple billionaire psyche model predicts this as a no brainer: having secured my family's financial future, owned planes, awesome houses and cars, enjoyed life to its utter fullness, what would I do with such a vast amount of leftover money at death's door? I know my analysis is as scientific as intelligent design, but I think it has some sense behind it.
I think we can agree that, at least at the core, this is an enormous gift and terrific responability. Nevertheless, regardless of how large the gift becomes, the next question that should be raised is how it will be used. I'm not a finance expert, but I'm sure that the vastly differing ideologies that exist here in the United Stated would come up with as vastly differing opinions on the manner of how the redistribution into charities should actually proceed. I would argue, then, that when the time comes, let there be a smart debate about it, but understand that it ultimately falls into the giver's choice. Whether this is leaving it to whim and luck, I'm not sure. These people had the knowledge, foresight, and a little bit of luck to acquire all their wealth, I think we can trust them to make the right decisions when it's time for them to "give it away."
Wednesday, July 7, 2010
Friday, May 14, 2010
Thursday, April 22, 2010
Happy Earth Day. It is a fitting time for the topic I was thinking of today. Likely the international holiday influenced the decision for such a topic.
Have you ever taken a look at a world map, and just tried to visualize how you fit in it? It is a humbling experience. You take a look at the scaled representation of the world, and then you realize that you are not even a small spec on it. It is almost a depressing feeling.
I value my life, and the lives of everyone around me. If you think about that for a little while, you realize that all your experiences, thoughts and memories are comparable to those of your neighbor, your brother, your lover. An entire world-sized span of being in your mind, and yet, when compared to the size of the world, you and I, are insignificant. Even more, when the Earth is compared to the Sun, the earth itself is insignificant. This Youtube video of Carl Sagan’s pale blue dot, and this interactive Flash application of the Scale of the Universe, helps me drive this point home more than any spewing of facts, numbers and sizes, so I will refrain from overloading this post with math and let you experience it for yourself.
We humans, with all our egos and our dreams, desires and ambitions, all require a small dose of the humbling force that is the vastness of the Universe. We are bombarded from every direction with notions of greatness and importance (celebrities and politicians even more). This has been going on since the beginning of time. Weren’t kings and pharaohs those whose families self-proclaimed to be destined to rule by divine decision? It is my humble opinion that this idealized notion, that we can be more than others, or more than Nature, immortal and everlasting, has created more problems than the initial founders of these ideas intended. The total disregard for human life we humans are involved in (Rwanda, Sudan, the Jewish) is, in my mind, a vicious example of the destructive effects that can result from the lack of humility of one or a few. And while our technological advances have ensured us “dominion” over the resources of this world, this does not mean we are entitled to “take what’s ours” for simply the very reason of taking it. Do we really need to kill an animal for a fashion statement? Do we need to destroy an ecosystem for a golf course? I understand that we should look out for our own species, thus I believe we should support science-based medical research, the meat industry (to an extent) and the housing industry (to an extent), but at the same time, always critical when such efforts unreasonably overextend their reach.
This brings me to the final point. Science has given us the tools to exploit Nature, but it also gives us the tools to co-exist with it. In the end, this will be our decision and our decision only. However, the negative influences that could affect this decision must be removed. Then, all comes back to the main point: we humans are not the last word in the Universe. And unfortunately, one of the problems is religion, which makes it seem like we are. Didn’t the Judeochristian God Jehovah say "be fruitful and multiply, and replenish the earth, and subdue it: and have dominion over ... every living thing that moveth upon the earth." (Genesis 1:28)? Wouldn’t an all-knowing entity know that populations are limited by their environment, and that the environment itself is finite? An all knowing entity would also know that not every living thing moves, at least not by itself, so maybe we shouldn’t be “dominating” plants, either.
Thus, must I really believe that an entity would create such a complicated and vast universe, only to put his favorite students in a tiny speck of it? I would say no, and go farther with the point. An entity that creates such a complicated system (the Earth) and puts it in an even more complicated environment has humans (defined as microscopic Earth specs) in the low priority scale of its to-do list. Thus, even under the existence of God, this feeling of uniqueness, of being special, the one’s favored by the creator of this universe… it’s time to lose it. We had our fun, but now, we have a couple of problems looming (overpopulation, climate change, poverty and hunger just to name a few). How will we solve them, I don’t know. Surely not by continuing with our current trend of thinking this Earth as a magical, limitless structure given to us by our creator because we’re special.
However, I think a good start would be to lose this sense of grandeur, of trying to reach the top, when really the top is absolutely out of any human’s reach. This “nothing is impossible” is absolute nonsense; we aren’t capable of everything (try reaching Mars by jumping). Thus, to lose our enlarged sense of importance (but not lose it altogether) should put us in the path to understanding that we are unique, yes, in the sense that we share this world, it’s a very small and limited one, and it’s the only one we have. Maybe, some years later, we will be able to celebrate a Happy Earth Day without needing to buy something, just a Happy Earth Day where every single person on this planet appreciates what “Mother Earth” really means.
Wednesday, April 21, 2010
How do I define this? Well, it is slightly complicated to put in a single word, or a single term for that matter, but it has to do with the painful but necessary process freethinkers undergo when they break free from tradition, dogma and their rooted beliefs. This term was coined by Arthur C. Clarke for his novel treating human transcendence, and has since been adopted by non-religious philosophers to mean the dismissal of religion. This also has other names, but I believe the most appropriate term is the “deconversion” from religion.
It’s curious how I, in this process, independently identified the “symptoms” with little exterior intervention. Specifically, websites like Exreligious and godisimaginary are pretty good at aiding people through this process, but like anything you read, they can play the role of a strong external influence. People with easily influenced minds could force themselves into hasty decisions, and this is something that you have to take with a certain stride, and profound thought. Thus, the fact that I recognized the problems I was having by mostly my own accord, and independently reached my own conclusions, suggests I was on the right track and on the right time. It tells me I was making a decision based on sound logic and careful thought rather than the romantic notion of “freedom of oppression” some rebel-minded fellows might feel identified with (but that is ok too). Even so, this is likely due to the fact that every time my mind wandered, it would wander to these subjects and thus I would spend more time thinking on these issues than the average person. Basically, I want this to mean that I wasn't told to undergo through this, but I naturally phased into it.
As for what these subjects, issues, or “symptoms” are, well, again, they are hard to pin down. I’ve decided I will explain them one by one in different posts, and in much more detail. However, there is room here to mention the basic issues I took on in the past years. This will set the stage for what I will develop in time.
In summary: It started around my third year of college, when I began having problems with the fact that much of the Christian belief system is placed on the idea of a book, the Bible, which just oozed contradictions. On hindsight, this was actually a mild issue for me. A book written by humans, flawed and contradictory? Not such a big problem, maybe even an understandable one. My big problems came when I began attempting to understand my religion (Catholicism) in parallel to my growing understanding of the human brain and science in general. When I began to ponder on what we know about the Universe, how God or a god fits in it according to traditional definitions, what an afterlife really meant, I began to see, quite clearly, how the ideas so many people take for granted are erratic, in an almost simple manner. It seemed bizarre, the idea of a loving personal God that is always there to help us except when it “is in his divine plan”. Then the fact that we are supposedly judged by our actions due to our “free will”, when this is as flawed a concept as any. Then that our reward for behaving well in this life (define good behavior) is to build ties with loved ones only to have to let go forever. Then the small point that so far, we’re explaining everything that was previously determined as supernatural, and there seems to be no need for one now and maybe, there never was. I would tell myself, should’ve thought of these things earlier, since they hold an important meaning for me and my future.
should’ve thought of these things earlier, since they hold an important meaning for me and my future.
Admittedly, these statements are crude, hasty mentions that really require more detail and thought put behind them. What I want with this is not to argue (much), nor to convert anyone (no need to), but to put my thoughts out there. In all honesty, these are the meanderings of a young thinker that would like to put his thoughts into words, and maybe, find some tranquility. Egocentric as that may sound, there’s more to it. I’m pretty sure that hundreds of people are undergoing a similar change of mind. I hope this serves as something they can relate to. I don’t want to be an influence, thus the disclaimer, even if it is bound to happen at some point. And while I expect little agreement, that is ok. You are a free consciousness; you decide what you think is right. Remember, in the end, it should be YOUR mind that’s making the decisions. However, know that once you establish this, the rest will follow through.